<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do Pacifiers Reduce the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? A Meta-analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/2009/09/do-pacifiers-reduce-the-risk-of-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-a-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/2009/09/do-pacifiers-reduce-the-risk-of-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-a-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wongcalvin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OBJECTIVE.: Pacifier use has been reported to be associated with a reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), but most countries around the world, including the United States, have been reluctant to recommend the use of pacifiers because of concerns about possible adverse effects. This meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify and evaluate the protective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBJECTIVE.: Pacifier use has been reported to be associated with a reduced<sup> </sup>risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), but most countries<sup> </sup>around the world, including the United States, have been reluctant<sup> </sup>to recommend the use of pacifiers because of concerns about<sup> </sup>possible adverse effects. This meta-analysis was undertaken<sup> </sup>to quantify and evaluate the protective effect of pacifiers<sup> </sup>against SIDS and to make a recommendation on the use of pacifiers<sup> </sup>to prevent SIDS.<sup> </sup></p>
<p>METHODS.: We searched the Medline database (January 1966 to May 2004)<sup> </sup>to collect data on pacifier use and its association with SIDS,<sup> </sup>morbidity, or other adverse effects. The search strategy included<sup> </sup>published articles in English with the Medical Subject Headings<sup> </sup>terms &#8220;sudden infant death syndrome&#8221; and &#8220;pacifier&#8221; and the<sup> </sup>keywords &#8220;dummy&#8221; and &#8220;soother.&#8221; Combining searches resulted<sup> </sup>in 384 abstracts, which were all read and evaluated for inclusion.<sup> </sup>For the meta-analysis, articles with data on the relationship<sup> </sup>between pacifier use and SIDS risk were limited to published<sup> </sup>original case-control studies, because no prospective observational<sup> </sup>reports were found; 9 articles met these criteria. Two independent<sup> </sup>reviewers evaluated each study on the basis of the 6 criteria<sup> </sup>developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on<sup> </sup>Infant Positioning and SIDS; in cases of disagreement, a third<sup> </sup>reviewer evaluated the study, and a consensus opinion was reached.<sup> </sup>We developed a script to calculate the summary odds ratio (SOR)<sup> </sup>by using the reported ORs and respective confidence intervals<sup> </sup>(CI) to weight the ORs. We then pooled them together to compute<sup> </sup>the SOR. We performed the Breslow-Day test for homogeneity of<sup> </sup>ORs, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for the null hypothesis of<sup> </sup>no effect (OR = 1), and the Mantel-Haenszel common OR estimate.<sup> </sup>The consistency of findings was evaluated and the overall potential<sup> </sup>benefits of pacifier use were weighed against the potential<sup> </sup>risks. Our recommendation is based on the taxonomy of the 5-point<sup> </sup>(A–E) scale adopted by the US Preventive Services Task<sup> </sup>Force.<sup> </sup></p>
<p>RESULTS.: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The SOR calculated<sup> </sup>for usual pacifier use (with univariate ORs) is 0.90 (95% confidence<sup> </sup>interval [CI]: 0.79–1.03) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59–0.85)<sup> </sup>with multivariate ORs. For pacifier use during last sleep, the<sup> </sup>SORs calculated using univariate and multivariate ORs are 0.47<sup> </sup>(95% CI: 0.40–0.55) and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.31–0.50),<sup> </sup>respectively.<sup> </sup></p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS.: Published case-control studies demonstrate a significant reduced<sup> </sup>risk of SIDS with pacifier use, particularly when placed for<sup> </sup>sleep. Encouraging pacifier use is likely to be beneficial on<sup> </sup>a population-wide basis: 1 SIDS death could be prevented for<sup> </sup>every 2733 (95% CI: 2416–3334) infants who use a pacifier<sup> </sup>when placed for sleep (number needed to treat), based on the<sup> </sup>US SIDS rate and the last-sleep multivariate SOR resulting from<sup> </sup>this analysis. Therefore, we recommend that pacifiers be offered<sup> </sup>to infants as a potential method to reduce the risk of SIDS.<sup> </sup>The pacifier should be offered to the infant when being placed<sup> </sup>for all sleep episodes, including daytime naps and nighttime<sup> </sup>sleeps. This is a US Preventive Services Task Force level B<sup> </sup>strength of recommendation based on the consistency of findings<sup> </sup>and the likelihood that the beneficial effects will outweigh<sup> </sup>any potential negative effects. In consideration of potential<sup> </sup>adverse effects, we recommend pacifier use for infants up to<sup> </sup>1 year of age, which includes the peak ages for SIDS risk and<sup> </sup>the period in which the infant&#8217;s need for sucking is highest.<sup> </sup>For breastfed infants, pacifiers should be introduced after<sup> </sup>breastfeeding has been well established.<sup> </sup></p>
<p><strong>Fern R. Hauck, MD, MS<sup>*</sup><sup>,</sup>, Olanrewaju O. Omojokun, MD and Mir S. Siadaty, MD, MS </strong></p>
<p> Departments of <sup>*</sup> Family Medicine<br />
 Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia<br />
 Children&#8217;s National Medical Center, Washington, DC</p>
<p> <strong>Key Words:</strong> pacifiers • SIDS • risk factors • risk reduction • meta-analytic methods.</p>
<p> <strong>Abbreviations:</strong> SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome • AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • OR, odds ratio • CI, confidence interval • SOR, summary odds ratio • USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/2009/09/do-pacifiers-reduce-the-risk-of-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-a-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MYMAM has launch new blog, ShareIT!</title>
		<link>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/2009/05/mam-has-launch-new-blog-shareit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/2009/05/mam-has-launch-new-blog-shareit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MAM has just launched latest blog, ShareIT! for parents to share their experience with MAM products. This is where we will be providing latest news on our products and services.
We have launch this blog because we want to share fantastic news about our journey with MAM products in which most parents who has used it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAM has just launched latest blog, ShareIT! for parents to share their experience with MAM products. This is where we will be providing latest news on our products and services.</p>
<p>We have launch this blog because we want to share fantastic news about our journey with MAM products in which most parents who has used it for their precious baby has never looked back ever since. Previously, we had great feedback but we do not know where to store these information. With MyMAM ShareIt!, people from all over the country can share their experience with how MAM products has helped their children.</p>
<p>Here, we would like share highlights of the exciting and upcoming mam products, (notice the change in our company new branding) and information that are vital to your baby. If you&#8217;re a new parent, it is even more important for you to read our articles pertaining to the safety of our bottles and why more and more parents are switching away from other baby bottles to MAM bottles.</p>
<p>If you are here for the first time, please log in to our website at <a href="http://www.mymam.com.m">http://www.mymam.com.my</a> to view our stores. By the way, if you are from a charitable company who wants to advertise with us, please feel free to a drop us a line at <a href="mailto:blan@nuline.com.my">blan@nuline.com.my</a></p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mymam.com.my/shareit/2009/05/mam-has-launch-new-blog-shareit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
